Judicial Conduct

Changes to our Complaints By-laws and Procedures

Changes to the process by which Council reviews complaints against federally appointed judges was an important activity undertaken this year. While always striving to protect the public interest, these changes were made in an effort to add efficiency to the process while still ensuring fairness for the judge. By posting the changes on Canada Gazette, Council sought the views of Canadians and engaged them in this activity. Consultations also took place with judges and interested lawyers across Canada. These changes to our Complaints Procedures, By-laws and policies aim to make our already robust complaint process one in which Canadians can continue to have confidence.

Summary of key changes:

• Complaints are sometimes referred to a panel of 3 or 5 judges for further consideration. In those cases, the Panel now has the authority, on behalf of the Council, to constitute a Public Inquiry Committee.


• The process before a public Inquiry Committee has been modified in regard to the opportunity of the Judge to make an oral statement before Council.


• Following the report of the Public Inquiry Committee, the judge can make written submissions to Council.