Some complaints are complex and not easily resolved. In some cases, the member of the Judicial
Conduct Committee who reviews the file will send it to a Panel of three or five judges. This
allows for a more complete review.
A complainant wrote to say that a judge used his status as a judge to influence officials to act
against the complainant. The complaint involved a personal matter between the judge, the
complainant and the complainant's ex-wife. The judge had become engaged to the
complainant's ex-wife. On two occasions, the judge accompanied his fiancee when she went to
the police to complain about her ex-husband. She said her ex-husband was threatening her and
she asked that criminal charges be filed against him. During the police interviews, the judge
made some inappropriate jokes.
The complainant also said that the judge tried to influence court proceedings about child custody
between the complainant and his ex-wife.
Five judges reviewed the matter. Because of the seriousness of the allegations, a lawyer was
asked to interview several people, including the complainant, his ex-wife, the police officers, the
judge and several others.
The Panel found that there was no evidence that the judge attempted to influence court
proceedings. However, the Panel was concerned that the judge was present when his fiancée
went to complain to the police. An outside person could think that the judge was there to seek a
certain outcome. Humorous comments can be misinterpreted. The Panel was of the view that
any comments made during such a meeting, whether spoken seriously or in humour, can be easily
misinterpreted. In that regard, the Panel said that judges should avoid such situations.
However, the Panel noted that the judge wanted to provide emotional support to his fiancée, and
that he never intended to influence in any way the police officers.
This complaint took much time to complete. This was because of the need to get all the relevant
information from many different individuals. While Council tries to complete all matters within
six months, there are usually 5 or 6 cases every year that can take more time. In all instances,
every effort is made to complete the review of complaints as soon as possible. // NEXT